Pediatric Neurology
Volume 34, Issue 1 , Pages 41-44, January 2006

Congenital Muscular Tortıcollis: Evaluation and Classification

  • Burak Tatli, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Neurology, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationCommunications should be addressed to: Dr. Tatli; Istanbul Tip Fakultesi; Cocuk Sagligi Ve Hastaliklari ABD; Cocuk Norolojisi Bilimdali; Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • Nur Aydinli, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Neurology, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • Mine Çalıskan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Child Health Institute, Division of Pediatric Neurology, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • Meral Ozmen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Neurology, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • Feride Bılır, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Child Health Institute, Division of Pediatric Neurology, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • Gonul Acar, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Child Health Institute, Division of Pediatric Neurology, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

Received 13 January 2005; accepted 14 June 2005.

In this investigation of congenital muscular torticollis, 311 infants treated consecutively for congenital torticollis over an 8-year period (1995-2003) at the Pediatric Neurology Clinic of Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Turkey were reviewed retrospectively. The clinical presentation, associated abnormalities, treatment, and outcomes of the overall group and of subgroups divided according to an ultrasonography-based classification were evaluated. All patients were evaluated using a standard approach: cervical ultrasonography was performed, and the patients were divided into two subgroups. Each group was scanned for other anomalies, and outcomes were compared. The mean age at diagnosis was 2.3 months; patients included in this study were 138 males and 173 females. Two clinical subgroups, comprised of sternomastoid tumors 85% and postural torticollis 15%, were identified. Passive range of motion was the initial treatment recommended for all of the patients. Follow-up data were available for all 311 patients; 95% experienced total resolution and 5% experienced subtotal resolution. We conclude that the majority of children with congenital muscular torticollis experience total resolution of symptoms. The success rate of conservative treatment is primarily dependent on the patients’ age at the initiation of exercises and ultrasonographic findings.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0887-8994(05)00343-7

doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2005.06.010

Pediatric Neurology
Volume 34, Issue 1 , Pages 41-44, January 2006