Pediatric Neurology
Volume 34, Issue 2 , Pages 101-105, February 2006

Responses to Lumbar Magnetic Stimulation in Newborns With Spina Bifida

  • Niels Geerdink, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Neurology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCommunications should be addressed to: Dr. Geerdink; Department of Pediatric Neurology, 820; Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre; P.O. Box 9101; 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • ,
  • Jaco W. Pasman, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Nel Roeleveld, PhD, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • ,
  • Jan J. Rotteveel, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Neurology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Reinier A. Mullaart, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Neurology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Received 22 December 2004; accepted 15 June 2005.

Searching for a tool to quantify motor impairment in spina bifida, transcranial and lumbar magnetic stimulation were applied in affected newborn infants. Lumbar magnetic stimulation resulted in motor evoked potentials in both the quadriceps muscle and the tibialis anterior muscle in most (11/13) subjects. However, transcranial magnetic stimulation did not lead to any response at all. A strong left-to-right correlation existed for amplitude and for latency. Lumbar magnetic stimulation proved to be applicable in newborn infants with spina bifida. Although current concepts regarding spina bifida suppose lower motor neuron dysfunction, the results of this study suggest that lower motor neuron integrity is at least partly preserved after birth. Transcranial magnetic stimulation does not lead to responses in healthy newborn infants because of insufficient synaptogenesis, myelinogenesis, and axon thickness. Therefore, conclusions on upper motor neuron function in spina bifida cannot be drawn. To what extent the method used here can achieve the aim of quantifying motor impairment is a matter of further study.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0887-8994(05)00380-2

doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2005.06.016

Pediatric Neurology
Volume 34, Issue 2 , Pages 101-105, February 2006