The purpose of this study was to implement an objective structured clinical examination for child neurology trainees for formative feedback regarding communication skills. Effective communication skills are essential and teachable, but tools to formally assess them are limited. An objective structured clinical examination is one such tool, but these examinations have not been developed for child neurology residents.
We developed nine standardized scenarios that highlighted communication challenges commonly encountered in child neurology. Child neurology trainees participated in three objective structured clinical examination events with three scenarios each over three academic years. Standardized patients portrayed patients or their parents. Each trainee–standardized patient encounter was evaluated by an observing faculty member using a modified Gap-Kalamazoo Communication Skills Assessment Form, the standardized patient who provided direct feedback, and by the participating trainee.
We refined the process of case writing, standardized patient training, and trainee evaluation throughout the three-year pilot. Results indicated rater agreement ranging from 32% to 56%. Trainees reported that the cases were challenging and reflective of real life and that the experience helped improve their communication skills.
An objective structured clinical examination can provide a standardized setting for formative feedback regarding communication skills in child neurology residency programs. The communication challenges posed by common clinical scenarios involving critically ill children, children with undetermined prognosis, and the triad of parent, child, and physician can be realistically modeled in an objective structured clinical examination. We developed cases and a process that were valuable and that we plan to sustain for resident education related to communication skills.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Pediatric Neurology
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Public awareness of, attitudes toward, and understanding of epilepsy in Isparta, Turkey.Epilepsy Behav. 2007; 11: 427-433
- Public knowledge, private grief: a study of public attitudes to epilepsy in the United Kingdom and implications for stigma.Epilepsia. 2004; 45: 1405-1415
- Epilepsy and social identity: the stigma of a chronic neurological disorder.Lancet Neurol. 2005; 4: 171-178
- Global priorities for addressing the burden of mental, neurological, and substance use disorders.in: Patel V. Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders: Disease Control Priorities. ed. Volume 4. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, DC2016
- Communication and neurology – bad news and how to break them.Acta Neurol Scand. 2011; 124: 5-11
- Breaking bad news: learning through experience.J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24: 5098-5100
- Milestone Guidelines for Residents and Fellows.ACGME, Chicago, IL2017: 16
- General competencies and accreditation in graduate medical education.Health Aff (Millwood). 2002; 21: 103-111
- Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence.Acad Med. 2011; 86: 706-711
- The use of simulated patients in medical education: AMEE Guide No 42.Med Teach. 2009; 31: 477-486
- The role of an objective standardized clinical evaluation (OSCE) in evaluation of student performance in a neurology clerkship.Neurology. 2011; 76: A267-A268
- Neurology objective structured clinical examination reliability using generalizability theory.Neurology. 2015; 85: 1623-1629
- Student assessment by objective structured examination in a neurology clerkship.Neurology. 2012; 79: 681-685
- OSCE in the neurology clerkship experiences at the neurological department of the university hospital Erlangen.Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2009; 77: 32-37
- Breaking bad news in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: the need for medical education.Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2014; 15: 47-54
- Assessment of handover communication among neurology residents: utilization of a handover OSCE and a standardized curriculum to improve transitions of care.Neurology. 2012; 78 (P07.237)
- Assessing neurology resident teaching skills through objective structured examination (OSCE).Neurology. 2013; 80 (P04.243)
- Good communicators are not stronger performers on OSCEs: neurology resident performance on a communication skills station is not related to overall objective standardized clinical examination (OSCE) performance.Neurology. 2013; 80 (P04.254)
- Role-play training imitating OSCE (objective structured clinical examination) in neurology.Eur J Neurol. 2009; 16: 330
- Neurology assessment by objective structured video examination.Clin Teach. 2016; 13: 348-351
- Requirements for Clinical Skills Evaluations in Neurology and Child Neurology.2017 (Available at:)https://www.abpn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/CSE-Neurology-2017.pdfDate accessed: January 2, 2020
- Assessment of communication skills and self-appraisal in the simulated environment: feasibility of multirater feedback with gap analysis.Simul Healthc. 2009; 4: 22-29
- The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance.Acad Med. 1990; 65: S63-S67
- Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives.J Med Libr Assoc. 2015; 103: 152-153
- Use of the kalamazoo essential elements communication checklist (adapted) in an institutional interpersonal and communication skills curriculum.J Grad Med Educ. 2010; 2: 165-169
Published online: September 14, 2020
Accepted: September 5, 2020
Received: June 25, 2020
Conflicts of interest: This study was sponsored by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interests regarding the publication of this article.
© 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.